1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 vs. 2000 Volkswagen Sharan
To start off, 2000 Volkswagen Sharan is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 would be higher. At 2,636 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volkswagen Sharan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 | 2000 Volkswagen Sharan | |
| Make | Willys-Overland | Volkswagen |
| Model | Aero-Willys 2600 | Sharan |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2636 cc | 1781 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 149 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2850 mm |
