1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 vs. 2010 Volkswagen Passat
To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Passat is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 would be higher. At 2,636 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volkswagen Passat, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 | 2010 Volkswagen Passat | |
| Make | Willys-Overland | Volkswagen |
| Model | Aero-Willys 2600 | Passat |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2636 cc | 1968 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2720 mm |
