1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 vs. 2011 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2011 Kia Cee'd is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 would be higher. At 2,636 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Kia Cee'd, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 | 2011 Kia Cee'd | |
| Make | Willys-Overland | Kia |
| Model | Aero-Willys 2600 | Cee'd |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2636 cc | 1396 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2660 mm |
