1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 vs. 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
To start off, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 would be higher. At 2,636 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 | 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | |
| Make | Willys-Overland | Land Rover |
| Model | Aero-Willys 2600 | Range Rover Evoque |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2636 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 242 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4366 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1966 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1636 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2662 mm |
