1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 vs. 2012 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2012 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 would be higher. At 2,696 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 | 2012 SsangYong Rexton | |
Make | Willys-Overland | SsangYong |
Model | Aero-Willys 2600 | Rexton |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2636 cc | 2696 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 161 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2830 mm |