1963 Willys-Overland Dauphine vs. 2010 Mazda 6
To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Willys-Overland Dauphine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Willys-Overland Dauphine would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1963 Willys-Overland Dauphine is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Willys-Overland Dauphine. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Willys-Overland Dauphine | 2010 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Willys-Overland | Mazda |
Model | Dauphine | 6 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 845 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 170 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1839 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2789 mm |