1963 Zastava 1300 vs. 1985 Mitsubishi Colt

To start off, 1985 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,439 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Mitsubishi Colt (70 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1963 Zastava 1300. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1963 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Zastava 1300 weights approximately 80 kg more than 1985 Mitsubishi Colt.

Because 1963 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Mitsubishi Colt (102 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1985 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Zastava 1300. 1985 Mitsubishi Colt has automatic transmission and 1963 Zastava 1300 has manual transmission. 1963 Zastava 1300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1985 Mitsubishi Colt will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: