1963 Zastava 1300 vs. 2012 Lancia Ypsilon
To start off, 2012 Lancia Ypsilon is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Zastava 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Lancia Ypsilon (84 HP) has 31 more horse power than 1963 Zastava 1300. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Lancia Ypsilon should accelerate faster than 1963 Zastava 1300.
Because 1963 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Lancia Ypsilon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Zastava 1300 | 2012 Lancia Ypsilon | |
Make | Zastava | Lancia |
Model | 1300 | Ypsilon |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 1295 cc | 900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 84 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2390 mm |