1964 Abarth 1000 GT vs. 1950 Allard K2
To start off, 1964 Abarth 1000 GT is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Allard K2 (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. (67 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Allard K2 should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Allard K2 weights approximately 560 kg more than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 1000 GT | 1950 Allard K2 | |
Make | Abarth | Allard |
Model | 1000 GT | K2 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 981 cc | 3622 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 635 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2700 mm |