1964 Abarth 1000 GT vs. 1962 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 1964 Abarth 1000 GT is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac Eldorado (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. (67 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 1495 kg more than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 1000 GT | 1962 Cadillac Eldorado | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | 1000 GT | Eldorado |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1962 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 981 cc | 6389 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 98.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 635 kg | 2130 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 3300 mm |
