1964 Abarth 1000 GT vs. 1980 Seat Ritmo
To start off, 1980 Seat Ritmo is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1000 GT would be higher. At 1,714 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Seat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 1000 GT (67 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1980 Seat Ritmo. (53 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 1000 GT should accelerate faster than 1980 Seat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Seat Ritmo weights approximately 325 kg more than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT.
Because 1964 Abarth 1000 GT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Seat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 1000 GT | 1980 Seat Ritmo | |
Make | Abarth | Seat |
Model | 1000 GT | Ritmo |
Year Released | 1964 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 981 cc | 1714 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 635 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2460 mm |