1964 Abarth 1000 GT vs. 1990 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 1990 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1000 GT would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1964 Abarth 1000 GT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 1000 GT | 1990 Chrysler Le Baron | |
| Make | Abarth | Chrysler |
| Model | 1000 GT | Le Baron |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1990 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 981 cc | 2501 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2560 mm |
