1964 Abarth 1000 GT vs. 1992 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1992 Ford Ranger is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1000 GT would be higher. At 2,298 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. (67 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 1000 GT | 1992 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 1000 GT | Ranger |
Year Released | 1964 | 1992 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 981 cc | 2298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1760 mm |