1964 Abarth 1000 GT vs. 1996 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1996 Ford Mustang is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1000 GT would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (350 HP) has 283 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Mustang weights approximately 710 kg more than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 1000 GT | 1996 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 1000 GT | Mustang |
Year Released | 1964 | 1996 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 981 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 350 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 635 kg | 1345 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2580 mm |