1964 Abarth 1000 GT vs. 1996 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 1996 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1000 GT would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Land Rover Range Rover (188 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. (67 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1455 kg more than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 1000 GT | 1996 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Abarth | Land Rover |
| Model | 1000 GT | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 981 cc | 3946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 188 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 635 kg | 2090 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2750 mm |
