1964 Abarth 1000 GT vs. 2000 MCC ForTwo
To start off, 2000 MCC ForTwo is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1000 GT would be higher. At 981 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Abarth 1000 GT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 1000 GT (67 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2000 MCC ForTwo. (40 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 1000 GT should accelerate faster than 2000 MCC ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 MCC ForTwo weights approximately 95 kg more than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 1000 GT | 2000 MCC ForTwo | |
| Make | Abarth | MCC |
| Model | 1000 GT | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
| Engine Size | 981 cc | 799 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 40 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 635 kg | 730 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 1810 mm |
