1964 Abarth 1000 GT vs. 2002 Toyota ES 3
To start off, 2002 Toyota ES 3 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1000 GT would be higher. At 1,364 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Toyota ES 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota ES 3 weights approximately 65 kg more than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT.
Because 1964 Abarth 1000 GT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota ES 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 1000 GT | 2002 Toyota ES 3 | |
| Make | Abarth | Toyota |
| Model | 1000 GT | ES 3 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 981 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 635 kg | 700 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2320 mm |
