1964 Abarth 1000 GT vs. 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1000 GT would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne has automatic transmission and 1964 Abarth 1000 GT has manual transmission. 1964 Abarth 1000 GT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 1000 GT | 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | 1000 GT | Cheyenne |
Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 981 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 2090 mm |