1964 Abarth 1000 GT vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1000 GT would be higher. At 2,945 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (251 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. (67 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 775 kg more than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 1000 GT | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Abarth | Renault |
Model | 1000 GT | Clio |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
Engine Size | 981 cc | 2945 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 251 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 7150 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 11.4:1 |
Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 245 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 635 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2590 mm |