1964 Abarth 1000 GT vs. 2005 Suzuki Reno

To start off, 2005 Suzuki Reno is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1000 GT would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Suzuki Reno is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Suzuki Reno (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. (67 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki Reno should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Suzuki Reno weights approximately 607 kg more than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1964 Abarth 1000 GT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki Reno, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1964 Abarth 1000 GT 2005 Suzuki Reno
Make Abarth Suzuki
Model 1000 GT Reno
Year Released 1964 2005
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 981 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 67 HP 126 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 6000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 65 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 74 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 11.5:1 9.6:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 635 kg 1242 kg
Vehicle Width 1360 mm 1730 mm
Wheelbase Size 2030 mm 2610 mm