1964 Abarth 1000 GT vs. 2008 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1000 GT would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 1314 kg more than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT.
Because 2008 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Jeep Cherokee has automatic transmission and 1964 Abarth 1000 GT has manual transmission. 1964 Abarth 1000 GT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Jeep Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 1000 GT | 2008 Jeep Cherokee | |
| Make | Abarth | Jeep |
| Model | 1000 GT | Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 981 cc | 2776 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 100 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 17.5:1 |
| Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 174 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 635 kg | 1949 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2650 mm |
