1964 Abarth 1000 GT vs. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1000 GT would be higher. At 3,628 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 2082 kg more than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT.
Because 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 1964 Abarth 1000 GT has manual transmission. 1964 Abarth 1000 GT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 1000 GT | 2008 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Abarth | Land Rover |
Model | 1000 GT | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 981 cc | 3628 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 17.3:1 |
Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 200 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 635 kg | 2717 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2890 mm |