1964 Abarth 1000 GT vs. 2009 Mazda 2
To start off, 2009 Mazda 2 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1000 GT would be higher. At 1,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 67 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 2 weights approximately 694 kg more than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT.
Because 1964 Abarth 1000 GT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 1000 GT | 2009 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Abarth | Mazda |
Model | 1000 GT | 2 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 981 cc | 1399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 73.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 18.0:1 |
Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 160 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 635 kg | 1329 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2500 mm |