1964 Abarth 1000 GT vs. 2011 Nissan Juke
To start off, 2011 Nissan Juke is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1000 GT would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Juke is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Juke (188 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. (67 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Juke should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Nissan Juke weights approximately 686 kg more than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Abarth 1000 GT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Juke, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 1000 GT | 2011 Nissan Juke | |
Make | Abarth | Nissan |
Model | 1000 GT | Juke |
Year Released | 1964 | 2011 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 981 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 188 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 635 kg | 1321 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1765 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2530 mm |