1964 Abarth 1000 GT vs. 2012 Audi A3
To start off, 2012 Audi A3 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1000 GT would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A3 (104 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT.
Because 1964 Abarth 1000 GT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 1000 GT | 2012 Audi A3 | |
Make | Abarth | Audi |
Model | 1000 GT | A3 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 981 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 104 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |