1964 Abarth 1000 GT vs. 2012 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1000 GT would be higher. At 4,367 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover (311 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 244 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. (67 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT.
Because 2012 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 1964 Abarth 1000 GT has manual transmission. 1964 Abarth 1000 GT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 1000 GT | 2012 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Abarth | Land Rover |
Model | 1000 GT | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 981 cc | 4367 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 311 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 2035 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2891 mm |