1964 Abarth 1000 GT vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1000 GT would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Roadster weights approximately 560 kg more than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT.
Because 1964 Abarth 1000 GT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Roadster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 1000 GT | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
| Make | Abarth | Mini |
| Model | 1000 GT | Roadster |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 85 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 635 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1892 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2467 mm |
