1964 Abarth 1300 vs. 1952 Buick 40
To start off, 1964 Abarth 1300 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 1300 (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1952 Buick 40. (118 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 1952 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Buick 40 weights approximately 1005 kg more than 1964 Abarth 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 1300 | 1952 Buick 40 | |
Make | Abarth | Buick |
Model | 1300 | 40 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 4066 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 3090 mm |