1964 Abarth 1300 vs. 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo
To start off, 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,570 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 1300 (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. (114 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo weights approximately 70 kg more than 1964 Abarth 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 1300 | 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo | |
| Make | Abarth | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | 1300 | Scarabeo |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 1570 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1030 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 47 L |
