1964 Abarth 1300 vs. 1970 Datsun 240Z
To start off, 1970 Datsun 240Z is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Datsun 240Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Datsun 240Z (151 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Datsun 240Z should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Datsun 240Z weights approximately 438 kg more than 1964 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 1300 | 1970 Datsun 240Z | |
Make | Abarth | Datsun |
Model | 1300 | 240Z |
Year Released | 1964 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 2393 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 151 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1068 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2300 mm |