1964 Abarth 1300 vs. 1997 Caterham C21
To start off, 1997 Caterham C21 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Caterham C21 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Caterham C21 (250 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Caterham C21 should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Caterham C21 weights approximately 60 kg more than 1964 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 1300 | 1997 Caterham C21 | |
Make | Abarth | Caterham |
Model | 1300 | C21 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 250 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 8000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 690 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2260 mm |