1964 Abarth 1300 vs. 1997 Toyota Camry
To start off, 1997 Toyota Camry is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 2,163 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 1300 (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1997 Toyota Camry. (134 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 1997 Toyota Camry. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Toyota Camry weights approximately 785 kg more than 1964 Abarth 1300.
Because 1964 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 1300 | 1997 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Abarth | Toyota |
Model | 1300 | Camry |
Year Released | 1964 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 2163 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1415 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1810 mm |