1964 Abarth 1300 vs. 1998 Ford Telstar
To start off, 1998 Ford Telstar is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Ford Telstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Telstar (163 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Telstar should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Telstar weights approximately 645 kg more than 1964 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Telstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 1300 | 1998 Ford Telstar | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 1300 | Telstar |
Year Released | 1964 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1275 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1400 mm |