1964 Abarth 1300 vs. 2000 Acura NSX
To start off, 2000 Acura NSX is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura NSX (480 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 343 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Acura NSX weights approximately 945 kg more than 1964 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 1300 | 2000 Acura NSX | |
Make | Abarth | Acura |
Model | 1300 | NSX |
Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 480 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 1 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1180 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2540 mm |