1964 Abarth 1300 vs. 2001 Mazda 626
To start off, 2001 Mazda 626 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 1300 (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2001 Mazda 626. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda 626 weights approximately 660 kg more than 1964 Abarth 1300.
Because 1964 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 1300 | 2001 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Abarth | Mazda |
Model | 1300 | 626 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 64 L |