1964 Abarth 1300 vs. 2003 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 4,292 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Astro (187 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 1320 kg more than 1964 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 1300 | 2003 Chevrolet Astro | |
| Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
| Model | 1300 | Astro |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 4292 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 117 L |
