1964 Abarth 1300 vs. 2003 Dodge Kahuna
To start off, 2003 Dodge Kahuna is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Kahuna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Kahuna (212 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Kahuna should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 1300.
Because 1964 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Kahuna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Dodge Kahuna has automatic transmission and 1964 Abarth 1300 has manual transmission. 1964 Abarth 1300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Dodge Kahuna will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 1300 | 2003 Dodge Kahuna | |
Make | Abarth | Dodge |
Model | 1300 | Kahuna |
Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 2429 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1710 mm |