1964 Abarth 1300 vs. 2004 Mazda MX
To start off, 2004 Mazda MX is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda MX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda MX (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MX should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 1300.
Because 1964 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Mazda MX has automatic transmission and 1964 Abarth 1300 has manual transmission. 1964 Abarth 1300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Mazda MX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 1300 | 2004 Mazda MX | |
| Make | Abarth | Mazda |
| Model | 1300 | MX |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 2261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2760 mm |
