1964 Abarth 1300 vs. 2005 Hyundai Matrix
To start off, 2005 Hyundai Matrix is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,795 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Hyundai Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 1300 (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2005 Hyundai Matrix. (123 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 2005 Hyundai Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Hyundai Matrix weights approximately 1180 kg more than 1964 Abarth 1300.
Because 1964 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Hyundai Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 1300 | 2005 Hyundai Matrix | |
| Make | Abarth | Hyundai |
| Model | 1300 | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 1795 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1810 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 55 L |
