1964 Abarth 1300 vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 1300.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 1300 | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Abarth | Ford |
| Model | 1300 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 4016 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 206 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 84 L |
