1964 Abarth 1300 vs. 2006 Jaguar XJ8
To start off, 2006 Jaguar XJ8 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Jaguar XJ8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jaguar XJ8 (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jaguar XJ8 should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jaguar XJ8 weights approximately 1080 kg more than 1964 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 1300 | 2006 Jaguar XJ8 | |
Make | Abarth | Jaguar |
Model | 1300 | XJ8 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 3170 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 85 L |