1964 Abarth 1300 vs. 2006 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2006 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Cherokee (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 1401 kg more than 1964 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 1300 | 2006 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Abarth | Jeep |
Model | 1300 | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 2776 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 2031 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 78 L |