1964 Abarth 1300 vs. 2006 Toyota Ractis
To start off, 2006 Toyota Ractis is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,299 cc, 2006 Toyota Ractis is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1964 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Ractis, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Toyota Ractis has automatic transmission and 1964 Abarth 1300 has manual transmission. 1964 Abarth 1300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Toyota Ractis will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 1300 | 2006 Toyota Ractis | |
Make | Abarth | Toyota |
Model | 1300 | Ractis |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 1299 cc |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1780 mm |