1964 Abarth 1300 vs. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,628 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 2087 kg more than 1964 Abarth 1300.
Because 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 1964 Abarth 1300 has manual transmission. 1964 Abarth 1300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 1300 | 2008 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Abarth | Land Rover |
Model | 1300 | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 3628 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 2717 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 105 L |