1964 Abarth 1300 vs. 2009 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,599 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Aveo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 1300 (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Aveo. (105 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Aveo.
Because 1964 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Aveo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 1300 | 2009 Chevrolet Aveo | |
| Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
| Model | 1300 | Aveo |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 1599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 105 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 3930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 35 L |
