1964 Abarth 1300 vs. 2010 Renault Logan
To start off, 2010 Renault Logan is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,388 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Logan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 1300 (137 HP) has 63 more horse power than 2010 Renault Logan. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Logan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Logan weights approximately 535 kg more than 1964 Abarth 1300.
Because 1964 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Logan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 1300 | 2010 Renault Logan | |
Make | Abarth | Renault |
Model | 1300 | Logan |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 1388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 74 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 50 L |