1964 Abarth 1300 vs. 2012 Ford Ka
To start off, 2012 Ford Ka is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 1300 (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2012 Ford Ka. (68 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford Ka.
Because 1964 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 1300 | 2012 Ford Ka | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 1300 | Ka |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 40 L |