1964 Abarth 1300 vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XF (335 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XF weights approximately 1372 kg more than 1964 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Jaguar XF is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 1300 | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Abarth | Jaguar |
| Model | 1300 | XF |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 2995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 335 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 2002 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2053 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2909 mm |
