1964 Abarth 1300 vs. 2013 Nissan Z
To start off, 2013 Nissan Z is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Z (327 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Z should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Z weights approximately 863 kg more than 1964 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 1300 | 2013 Nissan Z | |
| Make | Abarth | Nissan |
| Model | 1300 | Z |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 327 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1493 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4246 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1845 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1315 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 72 L |
