1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16

To start off, 1964 Abarth 2000 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 would be higher. At 1,989 cc (6 cylinders), 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. (70 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 weights approximately 855 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1964 Abarth 2000 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16
Make Abarth Armstrong Siddeley
Model 2000 16
Year Released 1964 1945
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 1946 cc 1989 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 182 HP 70 HP
Engine RPM 7000 RPM 4200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 88.1 mm 65 mm
Engine Stroke Size 80 mm 100 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 7.0:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 670 kg 1525 kg
Vehicle Length 3620 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1490 mm 1730 mm
Wheelbase Size 2060 mm 2930 mm